4H2+Discussion+Thread

Hi 4H2,

Please use this thread for the above-mentioned discussion. (Instructions are appended below, **//__please read__//** )

Please take note of the groupings, which are shown below:

Group 1 (1-5): 1. Andrew 2. Jun Hean 3. Jingzhan 4. Yuan Jun 5. Zhi Xian

Group 2 (6-10): 1. Delvin 2. Gordon 3. Jeremy 4. Jiang Shen 5. Brion

Group 3 (11-15): 1. Wei Yuan 2. Guo Sheng 3. Kenny 4. Shyue Tyng 5. Yan Perng

Group 4 (16-20): 1. Zhen Wei 2. Woon Wei 3. Benjamin 4. Kevin 5. Nicholas

Group 5 (21-24): 1. Zhi Hao 2. Yang Xi 3. Xue Quan 4. Yang Yi

There are three parts to this e-learning process, the first being an independent summary and critique of the essay assigned to you. The critique should touch on:
 * Brief summary of the essay
 * Main points in the section of the essay assigned to you
 * Evidence used by the critic to support his argumentation
 * Your own critique

Please find your essays below. Read directions more than once so that you do not mistake which section you are supposed to read: __ Group 1- __ __ [] __ __ Group 2- __ __ [] __ __ Group 3- [] __ __ Group 4- __ __ [] __ __ Group 5- __ [] The second portion is a collaborative work among group members, where you are to post your critique on the board, and respond to the posts of your other members. To facilitate this process more efficiently, please follow this format of posting: [Group Number] [Name]'s Critique

You can respond to either a single comment, or the entire critique that your group member has written. Do critique in the same manner as you had for your own article. You are also encouraged to respond to essays outside your group.

Finally, the third portion is a synthesizing of knowledge. Write a reflection of 400 words or more with regards to the article. Post this on the board as well in this format: [Group Number] [Name]'s Consolidation

Here's to a fruitful session of e-learning!

Cheers, Woon Wei